Wednesday 29 August 2012

A No Kill pound for Hornsby

As originally posted on facebook page of Monika's Doggie Rescue

A DoggieREscue .com supporter has asked for candidates for Hornsby Council to put their hands up if they will put forward a motion for Hornsby Council to operate a No Kill pound. 

I can go 90% of the way. I will be happy to put a motion that Hornsby Council use a no kill pound located either in the shire, or no more than 15km from the Shire boundaries.

Richard Boult, A ward candidate for the Greens.

The Greens have a comprehensive policy on Animal Welfare, including Companion Animals, which can be summarised as:-

VALUE ANIMALS LIVES
The way we treat animals reflects the way we treat ourselves and our society. The Greens work to ending unnecessary animal cruelty.

For more detail see http://nsw.greens.org.au/policies/animal-welfare 


My personal involvement with Save the CWA Building

My personal involvement with the Save the CWA building campaign is a useful illustration of my approach to representing the community.

I first heard about the problem when attending a local Greens group meeting at the CWA building, our regular meeting spot. One of the members circulated a petition to "Save the CWA Building", without much explanation.

As I was keen not to give the council any excuse to delay the new Aquatic Centre, I declined to sign the petition at that time, but decided to find out more. My initial thinking was "this building is not as old as me, how can it be Heritage?"

Best way to find out more was to go along to the newly formed Save the CWA building "committee" (STCWABC). I attended a number of  meetings. As I found out more - how much it meant to people in the area, how it was listed by various Heritage organisations, how it was a perhaps rare example of the architecture, I came to appreciate the building more, and people's passion for it.

Now I was faced with a dilemma. Would I support saving the building, if it meant a long delay for Aquatic Centre while other alternatives for access were explored.

Fortunately, Mark Cambourn came up with a very, very realistic, viable alternative, that actually looked better than the council's own proposal. (and to this day I am still convinced was a better proposal, despite all the lobbying and mumbo-jumbo council managed to convince the JRPP with). So now my decision was a lot easier.


  • I happily promoted the petitions to Save the CWA building. 
  • I wrote to the Hornsby Advocate - see December 2011 blog entry 
  • When  STCWABC  was in need of funds to put out adverts about the coming protest meeting, I took that situation to our local Greens group, and they agreed to fund the advertising.
  • I asked if it would be OK for our NSW MLC Spokesperson on Heritage matters could speak at the meeting, and got the approval from the STCWABC (well, Judy Hopwood), and I managed to get David Shoebridge MLC to come to Hornsby and address the meeting. (Personally I had other commitments that day so unfortunately could not attend in person)
  • I spoke in defence of the CWA building at the Joint Regional Planning Meeting.

Useful illustration of my approach to representing the community.
I believe this illustrates my openness to listening to, engaging with, community groups, understanding what is important to the community (regardless of my own prior opinion), why it is important, and then making sure their voice is heard in the right places, and do what I can to support that group, to empower that group.

This is what you can expect from me if I am elected as Councillor for A ward. I want to engage with and empower* community groups. Not just on heritage, but on all matters of community interest, including local area community groups and interest groups such as sport, arts, environment, social action etc.

Provided only that the issue is not in opposition to any of the Greens core Principles, which are values shared by the vast majority of community groups - Grass Roots Democracy, Social and Economic Justice and Equity, Sustainability and protection of the Environment, Peace and Non-Violence.

*By Empowerment I mean

  • making sure the group has all the information available, to help them develop a real knowledge of the issue, 
  • has the resources to properly function as a group and consider an issue -  perhaps a meeting place, a minutes secretary, a professional facilitator, expert advice, distribution of information, notices etc,
    and 
  • that people know the group is being recognised by council as a legitimate voice of the community that must be listened to, properly recognised and responded to.
By publicly recording this, I have also empowered the community to hold me to account. :-)



Wednesday 22 August 2012

Do you trust your councillors ? Do they really listen to you ?


Do you trust your councillors ? Do they really listen to you ?


Standing as a candidate for council, I find many of the candidates across the political spectrum say the same things – stop overdevelopment, protect the suburbs, cut costs and waste. And they promise to listen to community groups.

But the track record of many councillors is far from this. So why should we expect more from Greens councillors? Why should we trust them more than independents or Labor or Liberal party councillors?
The Greens councillors are bound to a few key principles – grass roots democracy, social and economic justice, sustainability. Greens councillors will always judge decisions on these principles, as well as local input, local knowledge and wisdom, and if they are tempted to waver there are plenty of people to remind them of these principles.

This makes Greens councillors quite different to independent councillors, often single issue candidates, who, once they are elected, have no checks and balances to keep them to their promises, don’t have published principles and members to keep them on track. Too often Independents are swayed by developer interests, or their own or friends personal interests or opinions. Greens councillors are always reminded of the principle that they are there for the community.

On the other hand, councillors from the two big parties have usually had their selection influenced by the party machine, and are beholden to the party hierarchy. At any time they can be told to pull their head in, if, for a current example, they conflict with the State party over matters such as planning laws, state developments etc. In contrast, Greens councillors are selected entirely at local group level, and the local group is autonomous from the party head office, provided only that they stick to the core principles. But Greens councillors  are empowered by the group knowledge and power of over 100 councillors and mayors throughout NSW, with a growing number of representatives and support and research staff in parliament.

And Greens councillors don’t just listen to their communities, or consult with them based on predetermined positions. Our commitment to grass roots democracy incorporates three key aspects that make us different, that truly empower communities.

Firstly, we are committed to open, transparent and accountable councils. So the community know all the facts and figures. No “we know more, but we are not prepared to tell you” excuses for making decisions the community do not want. Away with the culture of secrecy. Make information easily accessible, in a very understandable forms. Not reams of paper with thousands of words but too often missing the crucial information.

Secondly, we believe the council should empower the community, by empowering community groups to better engage with council. Help groups form, help them recruit members, gain skills in running a group and democratically representing their members and community, have an active program of engagement between council and the groups, funded by council.

Thirdly, we don’t believe council, in its councillors and the council staff, have any monopoly on wisdom and good ideas. We believe that the community often is as well or better equipped with both. True council engagement should be seeking to bring forward those ideas and that expertise to combine with those from the professional staff, with their role more one of melding the ideas into the overall council proposals, plans and actions. And by using local expertise perhaps cutting the costs of outside consultants, who anyway too often just say what the council wants to hear.

Council must engage with the community from the start to build Vision and Future Plans, not just late in the game going to the community to “consult”, often in reality to sell and get approval for a decision already made internally. Not one 3 minute say at a council meeting, but properly facilitated workshops with brainstorming sessions and other processes to draw forward ideas, to develop realistic plans, to fully engage a knowledgeable and empowered  community.

So let’s build a council we can trust. Whoever else is on council, make sure there are enough Greens councillors there that are truly committed to making grassroots democracy a reality. Use your preferences wisely.